Florida Man Files Patent for “Lather-Rinse-Repeat” Method of Spamming, Loses Infringement Claim against Spammer - 904 Views,

Summary: Back in 2000, Thomas L. DiStefano, III, of Boca Raton, Florida, filed a patent for a "Method For Managing Bulk E-Mail Distribution", in which the 'invention' was described as a method in which if not all email in an email run was delivered the first time, the sender would repeatedly send the email to the undelivered addresses, again and again, until all of the email was eventually delivered. In 2007, DiStefano's company, Perfect Web Technologies, sued InfoUSA, for patent infringement. InfoUSA is the parent company to such email entities as YesMail, who famously sued anti-spam blacklist MAPS for calling them a spammer, and who in 2006 paid a $50,000 fine to the Feds for violations of the CAN-SPAM Federal anti-spam law.
Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: thomas l distefano III, lather rinse repeat patent

Previous Article « How to Email a Text Message to a Cell Phone
Read Next Article » Google Launches Own Public DNS Service

Advertisers! Help support the Internet Patrol, and keep it free for the quarter of a million people who read it
each month! Want to see your ad on this page on The Internet Patrol, in this very spot? Email us here!

Back in 2000, Thomas L. DiStefano, III, of Boca Raton, Florida, filed a patent for a “Method For Managing Bulk E-Mail Distribution”, in which the ‘invention’ was described as a method in which if not all email in an email run was delivered the first time, the sender would repeatedly send the email to the undelivered addresses, again and again, until all of the email was eventually delivered. In 2007, DiStefano’s company, Perfect Web Technologies, sued InfoUSA for patent infringement. InfoUSA is the parent company to such email entities as YesMail, who famously sued anti-spam blacklist MAPS for calling them a spammer, and who in 2006 paid a $50,000 fine to the Feds for violations of the CAN-SPAM Federal anti-spam law.

In other words, it may be the first time in history that someone has patented spamming, and then sued a spammer for patent infringement.

All of this is coming to light now because DeStefano lost his patent infringement suit against InfoUSA, and appealed, and just this past month the Federal Court of Appeals held that DiStefano’s patent was unenforceable at least in part, because the method of re-sending and re-re-sending spam until it finally all gets delivered is - wait for it - obvious.

You can read DiStefano’s original patent filing here. We particularly like the (repeated) use of the somewhat slang jargon “marketeer” in the filing of a formal application, as it foreshadows the Mickey Mouse nature of the entire debacle quite nicely. And you can read the Court’s decision here (PDF warning)

Was this information helpful to you? If so, do please leave us a review!

Previous Article « How to Email a Text Message to a Cell Phone
Read Next Article » Google Launches Own Public DNS Service

» Spammer Sues Anti-Spammer - Cruise.com versus Mumma

» Microsoft Now Owns Patent on the “double click”

» BlackBerry Sues BlackJack

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Spam

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.