<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FireFox Security Holes Lead to Warning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-security-holes-lead-to-warning/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-security-holes-lead-to-warning</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Moonlight Gambler</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-security-holes-lead-to-warning#comment-4044</link>
		<dc:creator>Moonlight Gambler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 15:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1293#comment-4044</guid>
		<description>I've never had trouble with your site in either Firefox or Opera, but since your latest redesign it's impossible to read in Opera and looks weird in Firefox.
- So maybe it's not entirely the browsers fault?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never had trouble with your site in either Firefox or Opera, but since your latest redesign it&#8217;s impossible to read in Opera and looks weird in Firefox.<br />
- So maybe it&#8217;s not entirely the browsers fault?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hal</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-security-holes-lead-to-warning#comment-4035</link>
		<dc:creator>Hal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 17:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1293#comment-4035</guid>
		<description>I just can't understand what all the fuss is about Firefox and code compliance. I've been using Firefox for since version 1, and I recommend it to all my clients. The only sites that have a problem are those that still insist on using ActiveX or some other Microsoft centric trash. Sorry, but no web browser or OS is 100% safe; Firefox is just a little less unsecure, and a whole lot easire and fun to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just can&#8217;t understand what all the fuss is about Firefox and code compliance. I&#8217;ve been using Firefox for since version 1, and I recommend it to all my clients. The only sites that have a problem are those that still insist on using ActiveX or some other Microsoft centric trash. Sorry, but no web browser or OS is 100% safe; Firefox is just a little less unsecure, and a whole lot easire and fun to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-security-holes-lead-to-warning#comment-4033</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1293#comment-4033</guid>
		<description>FYI, it's just "Firefox," not "FireFox."  One word, one capital letter.

And I'll second Timothy's suggestion: Start with &lt;a href="http://validator.w3.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;valid code&lt;/a&gt;, and you'll find cross-browser design much easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, it&#8217;s just &#8220;Firefox,&#8221; not &#8220;FireFox.&#8221;  One word, one capital letter.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ll second Timothy&#8217;s suggestion: Start with <a href="http://validator.w3.org/" rel="nofollow">valid code</a>, and you&#8217;ll find cross-browser design much easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Wulf</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-security-holes-lead-to-warning#comment-4032</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Wulf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 16:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1293#comment-4032</guid>
		<description>As a part-time website developer  I can tell you that if one sticks to writing *valid* HTML and CSS your site(s) will work with ANY of the latest browsers. Stick to the standards set forth by the The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and you're golden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a part-time website developer  I can tell you that if one sticks to writing *valid* HTML and CSS your site(s) will work with ANY of the latest browsers. Stick to the standards set forth by the The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and you&#8217;re golden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
