<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox and Mozilla Still at Risk for Spoofing &#8220;Frame Injection&#8221; Security Flaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-and-mozilla-still-at-risk-for-spoofing-frame-injection-security-flaw/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-and-mozilla-still-at-risk-for-spoofing-frame-injection-security-flaw/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-and-mozilla-still-at-risk-for-spoofing-frame-injection-security-flaw/#comment-1967</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 19:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=706#comment-1967</guid>
		<description>The more pertinent question is, if the ubiquitous Internet Exploiter is also vulnerable, why haven't the "media" (ZDNet, CNet, Aunt-Spam, etc.,  broadcast THAT fact as well, or is this just another campaign to slow the lemmings from jumping off the MS boat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more pertinent question is, if the ubiquitous Internet Exploiter is also vulnerable, why haven&#8217;t the &#8220;media&#8221; (ZDNet, CNet, Aunt-Spam, etc.,  broadcast THAT fact as well, or is this just another campaign to slow the lemmings from jumping off the MS boat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-and-mozilla-still-at-risk-for-spoofing-frame-injection-security-flaw/#comment-1962</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=706#comment-1962</guid>
		<description>For what it is worth, my fully updated MSIE 6.0 running on WinXP SP2 failed the test, too, as did the same on a friend's computer.  Looks like Mozilla/Firefox isn't the only risky browser in this regard.  Where's the patch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it is worth, my fully updated MSIE 6.0 running on WinXP SP2 failed the test, too, as did the same on a friend&#8217;s computer.  Looks like Mozilla/Firefox isn&#8217;t the only risky browser in this regard.  Where&#8217;s the patch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Gerard</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/firefox-and-mozilla-still-at-risk-for-spoofing-frame-injection-security-flaw/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=706#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>Does this flaw also apply to Netscape? Since Mozilla and Netscape have a common ancestry (i.e. as they are basically the same thing) this is not impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this flaw also apply to Netscape? Since Mozilla and Netscape have a common ancestry (i.e. as they are basically the same thing) this is not impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
