Firefox and Mozilla Still at Risk for Spoofing “Frame Injection” Security Flaw   - 1,693 Views, 3 Comments

Summary: Online security company Secunia has said this week that versions of Firefox and Mozilla, as well as the lesser known Camino, are again at risk for a frame injection security flaw which has dogged Mozilla on and off for nearly seven years. The problem, ...

Previous Article « Put Carmen, Anna, Yasmine, Michael, or Eminem’s Mugshot on Your Phone - Literally!
Read Next Article » A Really Stupid Idea - Encrypt Your Email to Look Like Spam with Spam Mimic

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Online security company Secunia has said this week that versions of Firefox and Mozilla, as well as the lesser known Camino, are again at risk for a frame injection security flaw which has dogged Mozilla on and off for nearly seven years.

The problem, which plagues Firefox versions 1.x, Mozilla versions 1.7.x, and Camino versions 0.x, stems from the way that the software checks (or rather doesn’t check) content displayed in frames on a website. The software should, but does not adequately, check to ensure that the content in each frame comes from the same website. Thus someone could inject their own content, from their own website, into a frame displayed on a webpage of a trusted website. For example, the login frame displayed on a financial institution’s website could actually be hosted on a hacker’s website, allowing the hacker to collect usernames and passwords of those using the affected web browsers.

In order for this attack to work, however, and for an attacker to take advantage of the frame injection security flaw, a user must have a window open to both the trusted website and to the hacker’s website, to allow the hacker to inject their content into the window displaying the user’s trusted website.

Experts are therefore advising that users using the affected browsers should close all other browser windows before visiting a website such as a bank or other institution where the user will need to provide confidential information such as their password.

Firefox and Mozilla Still at Risk for Spoofing “Frame Injection” Security Flaw

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Put Carmen, Anna, Yasmine, Michael, or Eminem’s Mugshot on Your Phone - Literally!
Read Next Article » A Really Stupid Idea - Encrypt Your Email to Look Like Spam with Spam Mimic

Read more:

»  New Security Update for Firefox Fixes High Risk Issues

»  Firefox Flaw Found and Fixed (Get the Patch)

»  Firefox “Lambda Replace Heap Memory” Security Flaw Reveals Sensitive User Information

»  FireFox Security Holes Lead to Warning

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else, Hacking, Security, Windows

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

3 Comments »

  1. Does this flaw also apply to Netscape? Since Mozilla and Netscape have a common ancestry (i.e. as they are basically the same thing) this is not impossible.

    Comment by Paul Gerard — 6/8/2005 @ 2:40 am

  2. For what it is worth, my fully updated MSIE 6.0 running on WinXP SP2 failed the test, too, as did the same on a friend’s computer. Looks like Mozilla/Firefox isn’t the only risky browser in this regard. Where’s the patch?

    Comment by Dave — 6/8/2005 @ 6:19 am

  3. The more pertinent question is, if the ubiquitous Internet Exploiter is also vulnerable, why haven’t the “media” (ZDNet, CNet, Aunt-Spam, etc., broadcast THAT fact as well, or is this just another campaign to slow the lemmings from jumping off the MS boat?

    Comment by David Ross — 6/8/2005 @ 11:25 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 6/7/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!