Feds Trying to Gain Wholesale Access to ISP Records Under Patriot Act - Again   5/30/2005 - 1,315 views,

Summary: The Federal government is arguing, despite rulings by the court to the contrary, that under the Patriot Act they are, or at least should be, allowed to demand customer records and information from ISPs (Internet service providers) in secret, and without a court ...

Previous Article « Online Dating Site Halts Fraud Attempts (News Release)
Read Next Article » How to Get Rid of Internet Cookies


The Federal government is arguing, despite rulings by the court to the contrary, that under the Patriot Act they are, or at least should be, allowed to demand customer records and information from ISPs (Internet service providers) in secret, and without a court order.

In other words, the Feds are saying “all your Internet records are belong to us”.

The way that the government wants it to work is that they get to send an NSL (national security letter) to an Internet service provider demanding information about the provider’s customer, or the customer’s activity, and the law does provide for this.

What it doesn’t provide for is a mechanism for the ISP to challenge the demand. Without any court case (such as would exist if the government had to get a court order to access the ISP’s information), and without any other provision in the Patriot Act for the ISP to challenge the demands in the NSL, it makes it difficult for the ISP to say “no” or even “why?”

To compound things, the law prohibits the recipient of an NSL from disclosing that they have received an NSL.

The government says that things work fine just the way they are, and that the current set-up is necessary to protect national security.

But organizations such as the ACLU, and more pointedly, a Federal court ruling on the issue last year, disagree. The court found that the status quo represented an improper barrier to legal challenges, and that the nondisclosure aspect amounted to an impermissible gag order.

This past week the Feds filed an appeal of that ruling.

It ain’t broke, so you shouldn’t have fixed it, said the Feds in their appeal, pointing out that while the naysayers claim that the current state of the law and the Patriot Act prevent ISPs from challenging an NSL, “…in this very case, the recipient of the NSL did precisely what the NSLs supposedly prevent recipients from doing” (challenging the NSL).

Not really, though. The lawsuit was not a challenge to the NSL, it was a challenge to the constitutionality of the law itself.

The obvious answer to all of this is to amend the Patriot Act to include a mechanism for an ISP receiving an NSL to challenge it.

Don’t hold your breath.

Get FREE email alerts of new Internet Patrol stories!
    *We never share your email address with anyone

Email Address:
Date of first visit:
How you found us:

Subscribe
to The Internet Patrol on your cell phone    Email the link for this page to a friend!

Read more:

»  Feds Set Sights on ISP Records, Vote to Protect Libraries and Book Stores from Patriot Act

»  Feds Demand Your Search Records from Google in Lawsuit Where Your Privacy Gives Way to Witch Hunt for Child Porn Searchers

»  War Driver Gets Whacked by CAN-SPAM

»  Fly the Unfriendly Skies - Feds Want Broad In-Flight Internet-Tapping Anti-Terror Access for Fly-Fi

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Internet Providers, Privacy

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


We apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day!

 
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!