Comments on: EU Hears that Implanting RFIDs and ICT in People is A-Ok - if Microchipping is Good Enough for Rover, Why Not Humans?

By: Satan

Satan — Wed, 07 Jun 2006 11:21:44 +0000

I’ll tag UÂ´ll and trace U. I’ll haunt down and destroy U.
My purpose is to destroy all of GodÂ´s creation, and become the ultimate ruler.

Its Hot down here.
See U soon on surface…..

By: Betty

Betty — Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:14:32 +0000

I’d love to have an RFID that could replace my emergency medical information bracelet. For those of us with life threatening conditions, it could literally be a “life saver” to have that information in a chip which could be quickly read by EMS workers. But other than that, no thanks!

By: marcel

marcel — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:10:20 +0000

You probably end up with a tatoo saying 666…

By: Tom Woolf

Tom Woolf — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:48:39 +0000

I foresee RFID tags being used in the military and in children. For the military this would be mandatory. For children it would be the parents’ choice until the age of 16 or so, when the child could opt to have it removed. Non-military adults could opt in for medical or other personal reasons.

I am NOT saying I endorse the use of RFID in this manner, just that I (sadly) believe that the above is where it is heading.

By: ZacOz

ZacOz — Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:36:26 +0000

Sounds like the sort of thing being tossed around in Australia at the moment. All discussions so far appear to be surrounding a networked medical database, however in light of the failed “Australia Card” I doubt that this will become a reality in the short term. The most that could be expected in my opinion would be an implant that contains critical medical warning/information essentially replacing a medical bracelet/necklace.

By: libby

libby — Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:16:33 +0000

Oh joy! This is just the kind of “attitude adjustment” that King Dubya is looking for.