Email Authentication Shindig at the Federal Trade Commission   - 1,763 Views, 1 Comment

Summary: As many of you may already know, the Federal Trade Commission has been charged with looking at, among other things, sender authentication. This is important because when certain sorts of email marketers send out their "permission based email marketing", for some reason ...

Previous Article « Download a Movie, Go to Jail - Motion Picture Association Gets Tough on Piracy
Read Next Article » Apache and Debian Tell Microsoft that Sender I.D. is Still Deficient

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

As many of you may already know, the Federal Trade Commission has been charged with looking at, among other things, sender authentication. This is important because when certain sorts of email marketers send out their “permission based email marketing”, for some reason they don’t actually send it from their own machines, or even in their own names.

Sender authentication is one effective tool to help addresss that situation, by having legitimate senders identify the IP addresses and mail servers which are actually allowed to send email with their name attached. This identification happens transparently, during each email transaction.

However the industry seems unable to agree on just whose authentication protocol should be used. Should it be SPF? Microsoft Sender I.D.? Yahoo Domain Keys? All three? None of the above?

Well, if you are on the edge of your seat waiting to find out what is going to happen next in the authentication wars, hie theeself over to the Federal Trade Commission’s “Email Authentication Summit” next week, November 9th and 10th, at the FTC Conference Center in Washington, D.C..

However, in the meantime, and as always, Aunty’s strong recommendation is that you publish SPF records, and shortly Aunty will be telling you where you can get step-by-step directions for doing just that.

You can read more about this here.

Email Authentication Shindig at the Federal Trade Commission

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Download a Movie, Go to Jail - Motion Picture Association Gets Tough on Piracy
Read Next Article » Apache and Debian Tell Microsoft that Sender I.D. is Still Deficient

Read more:

»  FTC Says “No” to Do Not Email List, “Yes” to Sender Authentication

»  Federal Trade Commission Seeks Input On CAN-SPAM

»  Microsoft Takes Sender I.D.’s Case to the FTC Authentication Summit

»  FTC Defines “Commercial Email” Under CAN-SPAM (Email Marketing)

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

1 Comment »

  1. Email Authentication Shindig at the Federal Trade Commission
    As many of you may already know, the Federal Trade Commission has been charged with looking at, among other things, sender authentication. This is important because when certain sorts of email marketers send out their ?permission based email marketing…

    Trackback by Lockergnome's IT Professionals — 11/5/2004 @ 11:30 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 11/5/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!