eBay Slammed Over Sales of Fake Purses - Fined $74Million   - 1,859 Views, 4 Comments

Summary: Auction giant eBay was recently fined more than 74million dollars for allowing the sale of knock-off designer purses to go unabated.

Previous Article « Happy Independence Day from The Internet Patrol!
Read Next Article » Internet Patrol Email Updates Move to Weekly Format

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Auction giant eBay was recently fined more than 74million dollars for allowing the sale of knock-off designer purses to go unabated.

The victory was handed to French high couture outfit LVMH, which is the parent company behind such high end designer handbags as Louis Vuitton, and which also is behind perfumes such as the Christian Dior line. LVMH brought the suit because, they alleged, eBay was not doing enough to police and remove counterfeit versions of the LVMH brand products.

eBay countered that LVMH had brought the suit as a smokescreen for an ulterior motive: to reduce online sales of their products generally. eBay also used the “we’re just a host” defense.

Of course, somehow the “We’re just the host” defense is less compelling when you are profiting to the tune of millions of dollars by being “just the host.”

The French court apparently thought so too, and slapped eBay with the unprecedented outcome of “pay the plaintiff $74million for being ‘just a host’.”

Said eBay, of the result, which it is appealing, “If counterfeits appear on our sites we take them down swiftly, but today’s ruling is not about our fight against counterfeit; today’s ruling is about an attempt by LVMH to protect uncompetitive commercial practices at the expense of consumer choice and the livelihood of law-abiding sellers that eBay empowers everyday.”

Now, if this were a brick and mortar store, the authorities would just go in and confiscate the counterfeit goods - and the store would be out the money they paid for them. Period. With eBay, the authorities can’t just go in and grab the goods - and so we think that relying on eBay to do a more strident job of policing the products on their site is reasonable.

What do you think?

[Let us know what you think! For more "what do you" think articles click here.]

eBay Slammed Over Sales of Fake Purses - Fined $74Million

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Happy Independence Day from The Internet Patrol!
Read Next Article » Internet Patrol Email Updates Move to Weekly Format

Read more:

»  If You Sell Anything on eBay, the IRS Tax Man May Cometh

»  eBay Drops Plans to Allow Sales of Live Pets

»  eBay Admits to ‘Shill Bidding’ and eBay Sellers Jacking Up Their Own Bids

»  eBay Phishing Bug Allows Phishing Using Real eBay Web Addresses

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Around the World, What Do You Think?, eBay

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

4 Comments »

  1. That doesn’t make sense. So the burden is now on Ebay to show all the listing (beyond purse) are real? Since when is a corporation liable for a willful intent of 3rd party?

    Comment by Arthur — 7/7/2008 @ 9:46 pm

  2. why is ebay responsable?the scammers need to be find.A I’m sure ebay needs to get more detail on who is selling for security purposes.

    Comment by paul — 7/8/2008 @ 9:20 am

  3. I don’t think e-Bay should be held responsible - at the same time I’m STILL pissed off that I bought a knock-off Coach briefcase and there is nothing I can do about it. I could turn around and re-sell it on e-Bay, but then I’d be no better than the scum who sold it to me in the first place.

    Comment by Brenda — 7/10/2008 @ 7:02 am

  4. Exactly how is eBay to police this? They can’t actually examine the goods themselves. Can you follow up - did the French court offer eBay any guidance?

    Comment by Alan — 10/27/2008 @ 5:44 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 7/7/2008
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!