e911 - Is the FCC About to Require 911 Services for VoIP?   - 1,350 Views, 1 Comment

Summary: In the next installment of "As the VoIP Turns", sources are saying that the FCC is about to announce a requirement that all VoIP services offer basic 911, or "e911" services out of the box by a date certain. According to LightReading.com, "Sources who ...

Previous Article « Hwyblogs.Com Offers Free Blogging Service Geared Towards the Trucking Industry
Read Next Article » New Top Level Domains, Domain Hijacking, and Cyber-Squatting Awareness at Domain Roundtable Conference

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

In the next installment of “As the VoIP Turns”, sources are saying that the FCC is about to announce a requirement that all VoIP services offer basic 911, or “e911″ services out of the box by a date certain.

According to LightReading.com, “Sources who met with the FCC in recent weeks say the ruling will come at the FCC’s Open Meeting on May 19th, and will require VOIP players to implement 911 service on a nationwide basis within 120 days of the order’s publication.”

The sources go on to say that having made such a ruling, the FCC will then plead lack of authority to force the LECs (local exchange carriers) to make the process any easier on VoIP providers looking to make 911 arrangements with the LECs.

In other words, a coup for the RBOCs (Regional Bell Operating Companies).

Other experts aren’t so sure, and predict that the FCC will also require LECs to make e911 services available to VoIP providers.

Tim Lorello, CMO for TeleCommunication Systems Inc. explained that “The issue is, fundamentally, if they put forth a mandate saying that you have to deliver the calls with automatic forwarding information, and they do so without forcing the LECs to open up their selective router interfaces, then that will be a real problem.”

This is because VoIP providers are essentially at the mercy of the LECs when it comes to making arrangements to provide 911 services to their customers, although there are some third-party providers of such services. A mandate that VoIP providers make such services available on a wholesale basis within a set period of time, without an equal offsetting mandate to ensure that such services are available to the VoIP providers, may leave the VoIP providers up the proverbial creek.

And that is probably exactly where the RBOCs, their most direct competition, would like to see them.

There has been more than a little lobbying on the part of the RBOCs against VoIP providers in Washington lately, and the popular press has been on their side, with stories of both the state of Connecticut and the state of Texas suing Vonage over claimed 911 failures.

And what does this all mean for the consumer? If VoIP is already available in your area, probably nothing. But if it’s not, it could delay, or even possibly preclude, VoIP coming soon to a handset near you.

e911 - Is the FCC About to Require 911 Services for VoIP?

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Hwyblogs.Com Offers Free Blogging Service Geared Towards the Trucking Industry
Read Next Article » New Top Level Domains, Domain Hijacking, and Cyber-Squatting Awareness at Domain Roundtable Conference

Read more:

»  VOIP 911: Weakness in VoIP 911 System Leads to Lawsuit Against Vonage

»  SBC VoIP Gets 911 Service Because SBC Owns the 911 Service

»  How to Take Down the VoIP Competition if You are a VoIP Provider

»  VoIP Internet Telephone Can’t be Regulated by State, Says Court

For additional similar stories check out our archives on VoIP

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

1 Comment »

  1. Sounds like another case of the US government supporting the phone companies rather than the US citizens.

    Comment by Sheenada — 5/18/2005 @ 7:23 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 5/17/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!