Comments on: DeniedRealBig: Court Rejects Richter’s Request for Injunction against SpamCop http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/ Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:23:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: Scott http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/#comment-256 Scott Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:59:53 +0000 /?p=69#comment-256 I thought we always executed SPY's Nuff Said I thought we always executed SPY’s

Nuff Said

]]> By: Tyler M. http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/#comment-255 Tyler M. Wed, 30 Jun 2004 18:02:49 +0000 /?p=69#comment-255 Er, virus writing illegal? I thought only distributing (i.e. sending them out or running them so that they are spread) was illegal. Writing them though would be protected as free speech or at least legal in some sense. But perhaps I'm wrong. Er, virus writing illegal? I thought only distributing (i.e. sending them out or running them so that they are spread) was illegal. Writing them though would be protected as free speech or at least legal in some sense. But perhaps I’m wrong.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/#comment-254 Anonymous Wed, 30 Jun 2004 08:59:59 +0000 /?p=69#comment-254 ]]> By: Curt's Thoughts http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/#comment-253 Curt's Thoughts Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:21:17 +0000 /?p=69#comment-253 ]]> By: Curt's Thoughts http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/#comment-252 Curt's Thoughts Wed, 30 Jun 2004 07:21:15 +0000 /?p=69#comment-252 ]]> By: Rev Crusty http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/#comment-251 Rev Crusty Wed, 30 Jun 2004 01:16:35 +0000 /?p=69#comment-251 As far as I am aware viral spamming (creating data for non-client centered benefit) is illegal. Fortunately these viral advertisers can be traced and imprisoned. Some of us are not offended by pornography or new toaster designs but any software which hijcks our computer and displays an unsolicited email is a virus. And virus writing is illegal. As far as I am aware viral spamming (creating data for non-client centered benefit) is illegal. Fortunately these viral advertisers can be traced and imprisoned. Some of us are not offended by pornography or new toaster designs but any software which hijcks our computer and displays an unsolicited email is a virus. And virus writing is illegal.

]]> By: Call Me Al http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/#comment-250 Call Me Al Tue, 29 Jun 2004 23:15:20 +0000 /?p=69#comment-250 Works for me. Somebody should tell Aunty what those dumbquotes look like in a standard browser (which is not the "de-facto" standard, mind you) Works for me.

Somebody should tell Aunty what those dumbquotes look like in a standard browser (which is not the “de-facto” standard, mind you)

]]> By: Call Me Quentin http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/deniedrealbig-court-rejects-richters-request-for-injunction-against-spamcop/#comment-249 Call Me Quentin Tue, 29 Jun 2004 01:21:54 +0000 /?p=69#comment-249 Richter motion PDF referenced in the article is not found. I would like to read it. Richter motion PDF referenced in the article is not found. I would like to read it.

]]>