Court Uses Twitter to Order Imposter Twitterer to Stop Twittering   - 412 Views,

Summary: The High Court in the UK took the unusual step last week of allowing service of a court order on Twitter and, perhaps even more unusually, it worked! The order required that an anonymous defendant cease posing on Twitter as Donal Blaney, the blogger behind Blaney’s Blarney, and abandon the imposter account. The imposter account, using the monicker "Blaneysblarney", looked identical to the Twitter account under which Donal Blaney actually posts, at "Donal_Blaney".

Previous Article « New FTC Rules on Bloggers Blogging and Internet Marketers Marketing Testimonials and Endorsements Explained
Read Next Article » At Last a Fix for Wet Cell Phones and iPods with New Device-Drying Bheestie Bags

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

The High Court in the UK took the unusual step last week of allowing service of a court order on Twitter and, perhaps even more unusually, it worked! The order required that an anonymous defendant cease posing on Twitter as Donal Blaney, the blogger behind Blaney’s Blarney, and abandon the imposter account. The imposter account, using the monicker “Blaneysblarney”, looked identical to the Twitter account under which Donal Blaney actually posts, at “Donal_Blaney”.

The order also demanded that the as-yet unknown person behind the imposter @Blaneysblarney account identify themselves.

On September 18th, @Donal_Blaney demanded of the imposter “@blaneysblarney You’re not me: who are you? If you don’t delete this account & stop impersonating me I will report you to the authorities.”

When that didn’t work, Blaney did indeed report the imposter to the authorities, and went a step further, turning to the legal system. (It probably didn’t hurt that Blaney owns the law firm which represented him - Giffin Law.)

The Imposter

On Thursday of last week, a direct message was sent to the imposter account, saying “You are hereby ordered by the High Court of Justice to read and comply with the following order,” with a link to the actual cease and desist order.

While this sort of service by social media is highly unusual, it is not without precedent. In fact, nearly a year ago an Australian court allowed service of a lawsuit on Facebook.

Says George Lubega, a litigation expert with the law firm of Pinsent Masons, who operates out-law.com, “Courts are becoming much more realistic about these sorts of things. The usual method of serving documents is through the post, but court orders are served by fax, by email. I’ve even served them, effectively, by reading them out over the telephone, so it is not a million miles from that to serving it by Twitter.”

While it is unknown whether the culprit actually clicked on the link, Blaney says that he has complied.

In a statement on his blog, Blaney states that “The hitherto anonymous individual who infringed my intellectual property rights and set up the fake @blaneyblarney account on Twitter has, on service of the injunction requiring him to stop and to reveal his identity, agreed to comply with the order. I am in the process of negotiating a settlement with this individual.”

Court Uses Twitter to Order Imposter Twitterer to Stop Twittering

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « New FTC Rules on Bloggers Blogging and Internet Marketers Marketing Testimonials and Endorsements Explained
Read Next Article » At Last a Fix for Wet Cell Phones and iPods with New Device-Drying Bheestie Bags

Read more:

»  Phil Spector Twittering from Prison?

»  One Cool Use for Twitter

»  Celebrities and Imposters Alike on Twitter

»  Twitter Translates Itself with Twitter Translate Translators

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Around the World, Internet Law, Twitter

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 10/8/2009
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!