<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cell Phone Termination Fee Wars Heat Up - New Laws and Class Action Lawsuit Proposed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/cell-phone-termination-fee-wars-heat-up-new-laws-and-class-action-lawsuit-proposed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/cell-phone-termination-fee-wars-heat-up-new-laws-and-class-action-lawsuit-proposed/</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/cell-phone-termination-fee-wars-heat-up-new-laws-and-class-action-lawsuit-proposed/#comment-1155490</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1865#comment-1155490</guid>
		<description>The lawyer's comment is idiotic. A customer who has received poor service outside of the bounds of the terms of his agreement with the carrier has a case for breach of contract which, if successful, voids the early termination fees and future charges for service (as well as, possibly, refunds for poor past service). That has nothing to do with early termination fees in general, which are intended to reimburse the carrier for the discount from the phone's retail price offered in exchange for the lengthy commitment, and thus made up from the monthly useage revenue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lawyer&#8217;s comment is idiotic. A customer who has received poor service outside of the bounds of the terms of his agreement with the carrier has a case for breach of contract which, if successful, voids the early termination fees and future charges for service (as well as, possibly, refunds for poor past service). That has nothing to do with early termination fees in general, which are intended to reimburse the carrier for the discount from the phone&#8217;s retail price offered in exchange for the lengthy commitment, and thus made up from the monthly useage revenue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/cell-phone-termination-fee-wars-heat-up-new-laws-and-class-action-lawsuit-proposed/#comment-648432</link>
		<dc:creator>bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/?p=1865#comment-648432</guid>
		<description>I just heard about a researcher on coast to coast am that cell phone brain cancer is indeed real! Look at Kennedy, the big cell phone talker now with brain cancer. Also cordless home phones, wireless home networks, pretty much anything concerning radio frequency!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard about a researcher on coast to coast am that cell phone brain cancer is indeed real! Look at Kennedy, the big cell phone talker now with brain cancer. Also cordless home phones, wireless home networks, pretty much anything concerning radio frequency!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
