<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAN-SPAM Allows ISPs to Filter Email</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/can-spam-allows-isps-to-filter-email/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/can-spam-allows-isps-to-filter-email</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/can-spam-allows-isps-to-filter-email#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=437#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>Good grief, people are still confused about this?  This was the major point in the "well, it's not &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; bad" talk when the law was &lt;em&gt;passed&lt;/em&gt;---in 2003!

I don't even want to think about what would happen if ISPs were denied the ability to filter mail.  Our customers' mailboxes would go from about 10% spam (most of that labeled) to about 85%.  Never mind the viruses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good grief, people are still confused about this?  This was the major point in the &#8220;well, it&#8217;s not <em>all</em> bad&#8221; talk when the law was <em>passed</em>&#8212;in 2003!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t even want to think about what would happen if ISPs were denied the ability to filter mail.  Our customers&#8217; mailboxes would go from about 10% spam (most of that labeled) to about 85%.  Never mind the viruses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
