California Senate Sends Gmail a Message   - 1,943 Views, 1 Comment

Summary: The BBC reports today that the California Senate has passed SB 1822, aimed at limiting Google's ability to scan email coming in to the users of their Gmail system, and also limiting Google's ability to archive and sell the resulting information. Now, Aunty is ...

Previous Article « A Gaggle of Google Giggles (Gmail)
Read Next Article » To Unsubscribe or Not to Unsubscribe: That is the Question

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

The BBC reports today that the California Senate has passed SB 1822, aimed at limiting Google’s ability to scan email coming in to the users of their Gmail system, and also limiting Google’s ability to archive and sell the resulting information.

Now, Aunty is old enough to remember some real wholesale intrusions on privacy, and jaded enough to question anyone having obviously invasive powers, but there are a few things which occur to Aunty - maybe it’s her doddering age, but:

1. Google is a business entity, not a government, for chrissakes. Business entities invade your privacy all the time, especially when you are availing yourself of their services - if you don’t like it, don’t sign up for their services. The reason that a private high school can perform a locker search, and a public school cannot, is because the public school is, arguably, a government entity. The reason that pretty much everyone and their dog now tell you, while you are on hold for 112 minutes when calling their customer service line, that “this call may be monitored for training purposes” but the nice men in the blue suits have to get a warrant to listen in on your conversations is because, again, the men in suits work for a government agency. The people who put you on hold do not. Deal with it.

2. Gmail is a voluntary service, and you’d have to be blind, deaf, and dumb to not know at this point, before signing up for their free services (and did Aunty mention that it’s voluntary?), that they scan your email for content in order to serve up their Adsense ads with your email. (”Would you like spam with that?”)

3. Google is doing nothing different in terms of scanning email content than any one of dozens of spam filtering companies do - for which their users often pay them handsomely, not slap them with restrictive legislation.

But, on the whole, it’s a really good thing that Ms. Senator Figueroa is spearheading this new law, because goodness knows that in the U.S., and in California in particular, we wouldn’t want to break with tradition and societal culture and..you know, make people be accountable and responsible for their own decisions. Oh no.

California Senate Sends Gmail a Message

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « A Gaggle of Google Giggles (Gmail)
Read Next Article » To Unsubscribe or Not to Unsubscribe: That is the Question

Read more:

»  Can’t Access Gmail because “Your Gmail Account is Currently Experiencing Errors”?

»  Use Gmail as a Spam Filter for All of Your Email!

»  Weird Spam Asks “How Much Does Downloading Music Cost?”

»  Is Gmail Rejecting Your POP Password? You’re Not Crazy and You’re Not Alone

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Email Hosting, Google, Internet Law, Internet Providers

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

1 Comment »

  1. Thank you, Aunty! It’s one thing if GMail were trying to sneak something past its users or if the world’s email users were forced to use it, but now Google is being scorched left and right for being upfront about its intentions and tactics. This has been the most wasted expense of uproar in my recent memory.

    Comment by Danny Goodman — 5/29/2004 @ 9:59 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 5/28/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!