California “Identity Information Protection Act” Would Limit Use of RFID   - 2,158 Views,

Summary: If California State Senator Joe Simitian gets his way, California will come to the fore of states passing laws which restrict the uses of the controversial RFID chips. South Dakota is presently considering a law which prohibits implanting an RFID chip ...
   Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: california rfid law

Previous Article « EarthLink Wins Prestigious CNET Editors’ Choice Award for Web Hosting (News Release)
Read Next Article » Lawsuit Filed Against CardSystems Over Hack and Leak

California “Identity Information Protection Act” Would Limit Use of RFID        Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

If California State Senator Joe Simitian gets his way, California will come to the fore of states passing laws which restrict the uses of the controversial RFID chips. South Dakota is presently considering a law which prohibits implanting an RFID chip in a human, and Rhode Island is currently reviewing a proposed law which would prohibit requiring as a condition of employement or receiving services the RFID tracking of an employee, student or client.

The California “Identity Information Protection Act of 2005″, as the pending bill is known, would prohibit state and local government agencies from issuing RFID-bearing identification documents that either transmit personal information or allow personal information data to be scanned. The bill would allow the use of RFID technology in prisons, hospitals, and public health facilities, and at toll barriers.

Explained Simitian, “RFID technology is not in and of itself the issue. The issue is whether and under what circumstances the government should be allowed to impose this technology on its residents. This bill provides a thoughtful and rational policy framework for making those decisions.”

Of course, not everyone supports the bill, most notably those in the RFID industry. Said Holly Sacks, of RFID manufacturer HID, “While HID supports the basic intent of the bill to protect the privacy of people in California and prevent identity theft, we do not believe California Senate Bill 682 will accomplish these objectives. Our primary concern is the appropriate use of technology in secure identification applications.”

Sacks compared the data on their RFID chips to that on a license plate. “The difference is that the license plate number is fully and publicly visible, whereas the serial number programmed on a card must be read by specialized RFID reader technology at very close range.”

Was this information helpful? If so, please leave us a review!

SHARE:
California “Identity Information Protection Act” Would Limit Use of RFID
SOCIAL:        Friend Anne on Facebook        Follow Anne on Twitter        Twitter Explained in Plain English
SEARCH:
       

Leave a Comment

Previous Article « EarthLink Wins Prestigious CNET Editors’ Choice Award for Web Hosting (News Release)
Read Next Article » Lawsuit Filed Against CardSystems Over Hack and Leak

Read more:

»  Computer Viruses on RFIDs, Fact or Fiction?

»  ChoicePoint Sued Over Hacking, Identity Theft

»  A TIP Exclusive: Man with RFID in Hand Takes Your Questions!

»  Identity Theft Protection Available from Banks - For a Price

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Identity Theft, Internet Law, Privacy, RFID

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

(required)

(required)


 
 This article first appeared on 6/28/2005
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!