California “Identity Information Protection Act” Would Limit Use of RFID   6/28/2005 - 915 views,

Summary: If California State Senator Joe Simitian gets his way, California will come to the fore of states passing laws which restrict the uses of the controversial RFID chips. South Dakota is presently considering a law which prohibits implanting an RFID chip ...

Previous Article « EarthLink Wins Prestigious CNET Editors’ Choice Award for Web Hosting (News Release)
Read Next Article » Lawsuit Filed Against CardSystems Over Hack and Leak

If California State Senator Joe Simitian gets his way, California will come to the fore of states passing laws which restrict the uses of the controversial RFID chips. South Dakota is presently considering a law which prohibits implanting an RFID chip in a human, and Rhode Island is currently reviewing a proposed law which would prohibit requiring as a condition of employement or receiving services the RFID tracking of an employee, student or client.

The California “Identity Information Protection Act of 2005″, as the pending bill is known, would prohibit state and local government agencies from issuing RFID-bearing identification documents that either transmit personal information or allow personal information data to be scanned. The bill would allow the use of RFID technology in prisons, hospitals, and public health facilities, and at toll barriers.

Explained Simitian, “RFID technology is not in and of itself the issue. The issue is whether and under what circumstances the government should be allowed to impose this technology on its residents. This bill provides a thoughtful and rational policy framework for making those decisions.”

Of course, not everyone supports the bill, most notably those in the RFID industry. Said Holly Sacks, of RFID manufacturer HID, “While HID supports the basic intent of the bill to protect the privacy of people in California and prevent identity theft, we do not believe California Senate Bill 682 will accomplish these objectives. Our primary concern is the appropriate use of technology in secure identification applications.”

Sacks compared the data on their RFID chips to that on a license plate. “The difference is that the license plate number is fully and publicly visible, whereas the serial number programmed on a card must be read by specialized RFID reader technology at very close range.”

Get FREE email alerts of new Internet Patrol stories!
    *We never share your email address with anyone

Email Address:
Date of first visit:
How you found us:

Subscribe
to The Internet Patrol on your cell phone    Email the link for this page to a friend!

Read more:

»  ChoicePoint Sued Over Hacking, Identity Theft

»  Computer Viruses on RFIDs, Fact or Fiction?

»  California Offers Identity Theft Protection With a New Anti-Phishing Law, with Private Right of Action!

»  Identity Theft Protection Available from Banks - For a Price

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Identity Theft, Internet Law, Privacy, RFID

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


We apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day!

 
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!