AT&T’s New ToS Prohibits Customers from Class Action Suits Against AT&T   - 1,034 Views,

Summary: AT&T has amended the language of its Terms of Service (TOS) to prohibit AT&T's customers from participating in any class action lawsuits or class arbitrations against AT&T.
   Most Recent Searches that Led to This Page: at&T customer arbitration clauses, at&t p2p class action, at&T prohibit web server, class action against at&t over tethering, class action lawsuit against at&t for working and not paid, class action lawsuits against at&t internet

Previous Article « How to Get Rid of Gmail’s Pesky “On Behalf of” When Sending from Gmail
Read Next Article » Palm’s Pres Spying on Palm Pre Users and Reporting Back to Palm

AT&T’s New ToS Prohibits Customers from Class Action Suits Against AT&T        Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

AT&T has amended the language of its Terms of Service (TOS) to prohibit AT&T’s customers from participating in any class action lawsuits or class arbitrations against AT&T.

The new language dictates that “Any arbitration under this Agreement will take place on an individual basis; class arbitrations and class actions are not permitted.”

Even prior to this amendment, AT&T’s TOS already required that no AT&T customer could take AT&T to any other than small claims court, providing that “In the unlikely event that AT&T’s customer service department is unable to resolve a complaint you may have to your satisfaction (or if AT&T has not been able to resolve a dispute it has with you after attempting to do so informally), we each agree to resolve those disputes through binding arbitration or small claims court instead of in courts of general jurisdiction.”

Now AT&T is attempting to further restrict the consumer’s ability to have their day in court by mandating that not only can you not take them to regular court on your own, but you may not join any class action against them.

Of course, AT&T can word their TOS however they want; it doesn’t mean that a court will uphold it.

Indeed, similar language in other contracts has been held unenforceable by courts in California and Washington, although, conversely, a court in Louisiana held in favor of the language.

AT&T’s reason for including the anti-class action and forced arbitration clauses is likely that, generally speaking, large corporations fare better in arbitration than they do in court.

You can read the full wording of AT&T’s TOS as it applies to arbitration here.

Perhaps more interesting is that dozens of other companies are using the same exact wording!

In AT&T’s case, at least, I guess that they are really worried that their customers may just decide to reach out and sue someone.

Was this information helpful? If so, please leave us a review!

SHARE:
AT&T’s New ToS Prohibits Customers from Class Action Suits Against AT&T
SOCIAL:        Friend Anne on Facebook        Follow Anne on Twitter        Twitter Explained in Plain English
SEARCH:
       

Leave a Comment

Previous Article « How to Get Rid of Gmail’s Pesky “On Behalf of” When Sending from Gmail
Read Next Article » Palm’s Pres Spying on Palm Pre Users and Reporting Back to Palm

Read more:

»  Lawsuit Against Target for Failing to Make Website Accessible to the Blind Turns Into Class Action

»  Verizon Wireless Agrees to Compensate Customers for Lost Email to Settle Verizon Lawsuit

»  ‘Lost Clicks’ Web Site to Track Click Fraud (News Release)

»  Court Rules that Online Contracts Cannot Be Unilaterally Changed by One Party

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Cell Phones, Internet Law

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.

(required)

(required)


 
 This article first appeared on 8/12/2009
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!