AOL Thief Can’t Plead Guilty, Says Judge   - 2,354 Views,

Summary: Earlier this week Aunty told you that the former AOL employee who stole the email addresses of 92 million AOL users, and then sold them to a spammer for $100,000, was due in Federal court and was going to plead "guilty" to charges ...

Previous Article « Information Security Magazine Determines Top 39 Security Products
Read Next Article » Yahoo Refuses Family Access to Slain Son’s Email

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Earlier this week Aunty told you that the former AOL employee who stole the email addresses of 92 million AOL users, and then sold them to a spammer for $100,000, was due in Federal court and was going to plead “guilty” to charges that he violated CAN-SPAM. It was anticipated that Jerry Smathers would face up to two years in prison, and a large fine.

Well, things have not gone quite the way that the prosecution expected.

The judge refused to accept the plea.

Yes, that’s right - this guy was ready to plead guilty - “Yes Judge, I did it”, and the judge said “Not so fast…I won’t let you do that.”

The reason, you see, is that while it is clear that Smathers did something wrong…very wrong…his misdeed did not necessarily violate the terms of CAN-SPAM. Specifically at issue is whether the resulting spam was “deceptive” as defined by CAN-SPAM.

Now, his actions definitely violated other laws, and he has also been charged under those laws (and Aunty suspects that the prosecutor may amend their complaint to expand it, as well). So all is not lost.
In addition, the Judge has instructed attorneys for both sides to submit briefs clarifying their positions by January 12th, and has set a hearing for a bit more than two weeks later, on January 28th, at which time he will decide whether to accept the guilty plea.

But it just goes to show you: the only thing sure about the law is that nothing is sure.

AOL Thief Can’t Plead Guilty, Says Judge

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Information Security Magazine Determines Top 39 Security Products
Read Next Article » Yahoo Refuses Family Access to Slain Son’s Email

Read more:

»  AOL Mailing List Thief Jason Smathers Sentenced to 15 Months in Prison

»  Maryland Anti-Spam Law Held Unconstitutional

»  Invasion of Privacy Lawsuit Against Google Street View Van Dismissed

»  Former AOL Employee Who Sold Email Addresses Facing Two Years in Prison

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Internet Law, Internet Marketing, Privacy, Spam

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 12/23/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!