<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Your AIM Chats are Belong to Us - AOL New AIM Terms of Service Waives All Privacy, AOL Can Publish Your Chats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats</link>
	<description>Internet Safety, Windows Updates, Internet News, and More</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 18:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jillian</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-60802</link>
		<dc:creator>Jillian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-60802</guid>
		<description>Can you tell me how to view my boyfriend's aol im conversations without going on his computer?  He's lied to me before, I need to know if he's telling the truth.  Please help me do this. Thanks!
Highly appreciated,
~Jillian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you tell me how to view my boyfriend&#8217;s aol im conversations without going on his computer?  He&#8217;s lied to me before, I need to know if he&#8217;s telling the truth.  Please help me do this. Thanks!<br />
Highly appreciated,<br />
~Jillian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo Notenboom</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-2253</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo Notenboom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 16:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-2253</guid>
		<description>Nope. This article says that in a little more detail: http://ask-leo.com/can_i_retrieve_old_aol_instant_messenger_conversations.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope. This article says that in a little more detail: <a href="http://ask-leo.com/can_i_retrieve_old_aol_instant_messenger_conversations.html" rel="nofollow">http://ask-leo.com/can_i_retrieve_old_aol_instant_messenger_conversations.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-2251</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 05:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-2251</guid>
		<description>if there is any way to retrieve old AOL conversations that were not saved- someone PLEASE let me know. i'm going crazy. and i know there just has to be a way. please email me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if there is any way to retrieve old AOL conversations that were not saved- someone PLEASE let me know. i&#8217;m going crazy. and i know there just has to be a way. please email me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: codeman38</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-1343</link>
		<dc:creator>codeman38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 01:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-1343</guid>
		<description>They've updated the terms of service today, incidentally, removing the bit about waiving all privacy and clarifying which types of posts are subject to the provisions specified.  http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1776146,00.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve updated the terms of service today, incidentally, removing the bit about waiving all privacy and clarifying which types of posts are subject to the provisions specified.  <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1776146,00.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1776146,00.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelson</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-1342</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-1342</guid>
		<description>Michael: I think Aunty can hardly be blamed for not reading the Snopes article before posting, given that it looks like her article was published first.  It was certainly published before AOL made the "clarifying" statement that Snopes cites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: I think Aunty can hardly be blamed for not reading the Snopes article before posting, given that it looks like her article was published first.  It was certainly published before AOL made the &#8220;clarifying&#8221; statement that Snopes cites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: codeman38</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>codeman38</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>Also, this doesn't appear to apply to screen name registrations made through Netscape's site (My Netscape, Webmail, etc.). As if things weren't confusing enough already!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, this doesn&#8217;t appear to apply to screen name registrations made through Netscape&#8217;s site (My Netscape, Webmail, etc.). As if things weren&#8217;t confusing enough already!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>This is in the Privacy Statement of the AIM agreement, if all four corners of the document were looked into, they would see this too. 

"AOL does not read your private online communications when you use any
of the communication tools offered as AIM Products. If, however, you
use these tools to disclose information about yourself publicly (for
example, in chat rooms or online message boards made available by
AIM), other online users may obtain access to any information you
provide."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is in the Privacy Statement of the AIM agreement, if all four corners of the document were looked into, they would see this too. </p>
<p>&#8220;AOL does not read your private online communications when you use any<br />
of the communication tools offered as AIM Products. If, however, you<br />
use these tools to disclose information about yourself publicly (for<br />
example, in chat rooms or online message boards made available by<br />
AIM), other online users may obtain access to any information you<br />
provide.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aunty Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-1336</link>
		<dc:creator>Aunty Spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-1336</guid>
		<description>Michael Baldelli wrote: "Please read this before publishing this sort of thing to the Internet and scarying the bejesus out of people: http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/aim.asp"

Dear Mr. Baldelli - the present wording of the actual terms of service, as cited in Aunty's article, are the legal terms.  In the event of a lawsuit, the court would look to the language within the four corners of the document - the words of an AOL spokesperson would have almost no bearing whatsoever in a court of law.  AOL has indicated that they will be replacing the present TOS, which they admit is "inartfully worded", shortly.  In the meantime, Aunty's legal analysis stands, however if you choose you are certainly welcome to put the matter to the test.  Please be sure to report back to the class.

Kissy kissy,

Aunty Spam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Baldelli wrote: &#8220;Please read this before publishing this sort of thing to the Internet and scarying the bejesus out of people: <a href="http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/aim.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/aim.asp</a>&#8221;</p>
<p>Dear Mr. Baldelli - the present wording of the actual terms of service, as cited in Aunty&#8217;s article, are the legal terms.  In the event of a lawsuit, the court would look to the language within the four corners of the document - the words of an AOL spokesperson would have almost no bearing whatsoever in a court of law.  AOL has indicated that they will be replacing the present TOS, which they admit is &#8220;inartfully worded&#8221;, shortly.  In the meantime, Aunty&#8217;s legal analysis stands, however if you choose you are certainly welcome to put the matter to the test.  Please be sure to report back to the class.</p>
<p>Kissy kissy,</p>
<p>Aunty Spam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Andrew Baldelli</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-1335</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Andrew Baldelli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-1335</guid>
		<description>Please read this before publishing this sort of thing to the Internet and scarying the bejesus out of people:

http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/aim.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please read this before publishing this sort of thing to the Internet and scarying the bejesus out of people:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/aim.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/computer/internet/aim.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeteB</title>
		<link>http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/all-your-aim-chats-are-belong-to-us-aol-new-aim-terms-of-service-waives-all-privacy-aol-can-publish-your-chats#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>PeteB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=442#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>I don't think they can publish conversations that took place under their old TOS *unless* you accept the new TOS at which point they can pretty much do what they like. Accepting the new TOS could be implied simply by continuing to use AIM. It would be a very interesting court case...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think they can publish conversations that took place under their old TOS *unless* you accept the new TOS at which point they can pretty much do what they like. Accepting the new TOS could be implied simply by continuing to use AIM. It would be a very interesting court case&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
