Adult-Themed Website Perfect 10 Sues Google, Amazon Over Search Results   8/1/2005 - 1,267 views, 1 Comment

Summary: Perfect 10, an online and offline publisher of adult content, has filed a lawsuit against Google and Amazon, claiming that by turning up images of Perfect 10's... um... "models"... in searches for, oh, who knows, maybe "nekkid women", Google and Amazon's A9 are ...

Previous Article « Grand Theft Auto Worm Hagbard.A Offers Hot Water, Not Hot Coffee
Read Next Article » Online Consumers Don’t Like Pop-Ups, Flash Animation, Says Survey

Perfect 10, an online and offline publisher of adult content, has filed a lawsuit against Google and Amazon, claiming that by turning up images of Perfect 10’s… um… “models”… in searches for, oh, who knows, maybe “nekkid women”, Google and Amazon’s A9 are violating Perfect 10’s copyright.

Said Norm Zada, Perfect 10’s founder, “I claim that what they’ve done is to display misappropriated intellectual property. They are displaying at least 3,000 of our best pictures for free.”

Zada’s primary argument in the lawsuit seems to be that people use Google to search for pictures of the Perfect 10 women, and then click on the sponsored links on the results page, which links are to advertisers using Google’s Adwords and Adsense programs.

“Google is not a search engine anymore. They are a commercial enterprise. They are listing pages first that are advertising with Google,” said Zada. Therefore, the argument goes, Google is profiting from infringing Perfect 10’s copyright interest in the images.

Interestingly, the attorney who brought this lawsuit for Perfect 10 is the same attorney who brought the lawsuit against Grokster, Russell Frackman. Said Jason Schultz, an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, with not a little apparent disdain, “Frackman believes that everyone should be held responsible for policing content infringement on the Internet, or whoever has the deepest pockets should. The copyright maximalists hate intermediaries — search engines, ISPs and anyone else with whom they don’t have a direct licensing agreement.”

Get FREE email alerts of new Internet Patrol stories!
    *We never share your email address with anyone

Email Address:
Date of first visit:
How you found us:

Subscribe
to The Internet Patrol on your cell phone    Email the link for this page to a friend!

Read more:

»  Google Apologizes for “Jew” Offensive Search Results

»  Google Sued By Pornographer for Their Search Engine Working…Too Well?

»  The Site You Are About to Visit May Harm Your Computer! Google Warns Searchers of Malware-Infested Search Results

»  MSN Blocks Porn Better Than Google and Yahoo

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Google, Internet Law, Over 18

 

1 Comment »

  1. Have these guys never heard of referrer blocking? ::shakes head::

    Comment by codeman38 — 8/2/2005 @ 4:28 am

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


We apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day!

 
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!