950,000 .info Domains Grabbed and Held by Registrar   - 1,372 Views, 2 Comments

Summary: Internet domain registrar eNom is in hot water for reportedly attempting to grab as many as 950,000 (that's "nine hundred fifty thousand") .info domain names for domains which already exist as .com domains. According to a report by Netcraft, eNom registered the domains through ...

Previous Article « Vote for Whomever You Want - But Don’t Take This Poll!
Read Next Article » Handful of Zombie Networks Responsible for All Phishing Attacks

  Follow Anne on Twitter     Friend Anne on Facebook

Internet domain registrar eNom is in hot water for reportedly attempting to grab as many as 950,000 (that’s “nine hundred fifty thousand“) .info domain names for domains which already exist as .com domains.

According to a report by Netcraft, eNom registered the domains through Sipence, which, interestingly enough, shares a street address with eNom.

eNom customers have been told that the domains, which by some accounts were registered using the name and contact details of whomever holds the related .com domain, were registered on their behalf. While some have been told that there will be no additional charge for their new (and unasked for) .info domains, others have been told that the domains would be available to them for a small fee.

Even if eNom has no intention of charging the surprised new owner of a bouncing .info domain, Aunty says that they are wrong, wrong, wrong to register a domain in a third-party’s name without their knowledge, let alone permission. Apparently at least some of eNom’s customers feel the same way, with Netcraft reporting that
some eNom customers “are asserting that Sipence/eNom has effectively acted as a cybersquatter”.

You can read more about this here.

You can read the postings of unhappy eNom customers here.

950,000 .info Domains Grabbed and Held by Registrar

 Follow Anne on Twitter

 Twitter Explained in Plain English

 Friend Anne on Facebook

Previous Article « Vote for Whomever You Want - But Don’t Take This Poll!
Read Next Article » Handful of Zombie Networks Responsible for All Phishing Attacks

Read more:

»  If You Use RegisterFly You Need to Find a New Registrar - RegisterFly Loses Domain Registrar Accreditation

»  Transferring Domains No Longer Requires Consent - Registrars Advise That You Lock Your Domain

»  Domain Tasting - The New Evil

»  Massive Joker DNS DOS Takes Out Portion of Internet

For additional similar stories check out our archives on Everything Else

NOTE: We never, ever, ever will recommend any product or service on this site that we have not regularly used ourselves and do not wholeheartedly believe in. That said, in some cases after being very pleased with a product or service, we may enter into a relationship with the provider of that product or service such that if someone purchases that product or service based on our recommendation, we may get a small payment. Such payments go towards the upkeep of the Internet Patrol.

 

2 Comments »


  1. Comment by Anonymous — 10/22/2004 @ 4:51 pm

  2. I’m not sure about the law in this case, but it’s possible that the new ‘owner’ of an info domain could just say thanks to eNom and wave goodbye as they take off with their free domain. I’m betting that a court might place that in the same category as unsolicited gifts received in the mail (that someone later tries to charge you for).

    Comment by Jeff Partridge — 10/23/2004 @ 10:58 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Warning! All comments which contain URLs and are clearly just spam to generate a link back to the URL will be deleted on sight. Don't bother wasting your time!

If you are going to include a URL in your comment,
please keep it under 25 characters in length,
or use TinyURL to shorten it before including it in your comment.

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic, your email address is never displayed.
HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)


If you have not posted a comment here before, we apologize for having to ask you to enter the letters and numbers you see in the image above to validate your comment, but we are being attacked by thousands of comment form spams every day! You only need to do this once; once you have successfuly posted a comment here you will not be asked to do this again. Thank you for your understanding!

 
 This article first appeared on 10/21/2004
The Internet Patrol
Patrolling the Internet for You!